Tributes: Homage to the Masters

This haunting late-career self-portrait shows the 53-year-old Rembrandt confronting his own aging with unflinching honesty. When I attempted to recreate this masterpiece, I discovered:

• The Weight of Wisdom: Those shadowed eyes contain lifetimes of artistic triumph and personal tragedy. 

• The Illusion of Simplicity: What appears as loose brushwork is actually meticulously calculated - each stroke simultaneously defines form and dissolves into abstraction.

• A Technical Rebellion: Rembrandt broke every rule here - thick impasto highlights next to translucent shadows, rough textures against smooth skin. My acrylic version had to invent new approaches to mimic his daring.

 

Why This Portrait?
Because it represents the ultimate artist's challenge: capturing the soul behind your own reflection. Rembrandt didn't just paint his face - he documented an artist's hard-won resilience.

Acrylic on Board

Rembrandt’s Anna and the Blind Tobit (1630) isn’t just a biblical scene—it’s a masterclass in emotional chiaroscuro. Studying this piece taught me how to wield shadow like a sculptor:

• The Challenge: Capturing Anna’s resigned gesture and Tobit’s milky gaze without relying on Rembrandt’s famed earth pigments (I used modern acrylics to approximate his warmth).

• The Revelation: His genius lies in the unfinished details—the rough weave of Anna’s sleeve, the ghostly outline of the dog. My tribute leans into these "unpolished" moments.

 

Why Reproduce This?
Because some stories demand to be retold. This scene—of quiet devotion in dim light—feels eerily modern in an age of distraction.

Acrylic on Board

For Sale

This isn’t just a painting—it’s a visual heartbeat. Van Gogh created this in Saint-Rémy, wrestling with his mental health while refining his signature whirlpools of color. Reproducing it taught me:

• The Frenzy in the Strokes: Those coiled blues and greens aren’t just background—they’re electric tension. Matching his thick, directional impasto required squeezing paint straight from the tube.

• The Paradox of the Eyes: Van Gogh’s gaze is both fierce and vulnerable. I layered thin ochre glazes to achieve that haunted glow.

• The Lie of ‘Flat’ Color: His "blue" jacket contains violet, teal, and even fiery orange—proof that shadows breathe.

 

Why This Portrait?
Because it’s art as survival. Every twisted stroke screams, “I am here, I am alive, I am making beauty from the chaos.

Acrylic on Canvas

This isn’t just a landscape—it’s Van Gogh’s last scream in paint. Reproducing his apocalyptic wheatfield taught me:

• The Violence of the Sky: Those inky blues aren’t passive—they collide with the gold. I mixed Prussian blue with black lava gel to mimic his tar-thick strokes.

• The Crows Aren’t Birds, They’re Omens: Each darting silhouette was painted with a single loaded brushstroke (then reworked 12 times to get their suicidal dive just right).

• The Path to Nowhere: That central fork? It’s not a composition choice—it’s a question. My version leans into the cadmium yellow’s sickly glow to amplify the unease.

Why This Painting?
Because it’s art history’s most haunting farewell note. Van Gogh didn’t paint a field—he painted the moment the world becomes too heavy to hold.

Acrylic on Canvas

For Sale

For Vincent in Brixton—a play about Van Gogh’s transformative years in London—I reimagined the city’s iconic cathedral as he might have seen it. Not the real St. Paul’s, but the emotional truth of its grandeur:

• Van Gogh’s London Palette: Swirling Prussian blues and sulfur yellows replace soot-stained stone, echoing his letters about London’s "violet fog" and "golden lamps."

• Theatrical Licence: The cathedral’s dome undulates like a living thing—an homage to Vincent’s later turbulence, though he’d never paint this view. (A secret nod to the play’s themes of memory and distortion.)​

Why This Fusion?
Because theatre—like Vincent’s art—isn’t about documentation, but alchemy. This isn’t London as it was, but London felt through the eyes of a future legend.

Acrylic on Canvas

This brooding early self-portrait— original painted when Turner was just 24—hints at the turbulent genius he’d become. Reproducing it in acrylic taught me:

• The Ambition in the Shadows: That dark, Rembrandtesque background isn’t just mood—it’s a young artist daring you to take him seriously. Matching its velvety depth required 8 layers of Payne’s grey glaze.

• The Defiance in the Gaze: Turner’s eyes don’t engage the viewer—they look past them, already fixed on horizons only he could see. Capturing that visionary stare meant leaving the pupils slightly unfocused.

• Acrylic’s Paradox: To mimic Turner’s oil translucency, I used retarder medium to slow drying time, blending skin tones like watercolors—a technique he’d later weaponise in his storms.

Why This Portrait?
Because it’s a manifesto in paint. Every restrained brushstroke whispers: “I’ll burn the rules later—first, I’ll master them."

Acrylic on Canvas

For Sale

This watercolour tribute to Turner’s Venetian obsession captures the moment his brush began to outpace his eyes—when architecture dissolved into pure atmosphere.

Why Watercolour?
• Turner’s Ghost Medium: Though he often used oils for Venice, his travel sketches relied on watercolour’s immediacy—perfect for capturing light before the lagoon stole it.
• The Stain of Genius: Those bleeding aureolin yellows and Prussian blue washes? They mimic Turner’s infamous "blots," where a single soaked stroke could imply a palace or its reflection.
A Technical Rebellion
Turner mixed gum arabic with seawater for texture. I cheated with salt, but the effect is the same: a city crumbling at the edges.

Watercolour on cartridge paper

For Sale

This was my attempt to walk in Turner’s footsteps—to understand, through my own hand, how he transformed water and rock into pure emotion.

Working in acrylic, I focused on:

• The precision behind his chaos – every brushstroke in the churning foam is deliberate

• His layered illusions – how warm and cool tones create impossible depth

• The weight he gave to light – not just reflecting, but generating from within the falls

Why this piece?
Because Turner’s Reichenbach Falls marks the moment the sublime broke free from classical restraint. I wanted to feel that liberation in my own process.

Acrylic on Canvas Board

For Sale

This pencil study was my attempt to meet the Old Master in his own medium—to understand, through my own hand, how those famous marks came to be.

What the Drawing Taught Me:

• The Weight of a Line: Da Vinci’s beard strokes aren’t uniform—they vary from gossamer to grave, mapping the contours of wisdom.

• The Illusion of Age: Those wrinkles are constructed, not traced—each one a deliberate decision about light’s betrayal of time.

• The Silence of Paper: Working in pencil forced me to see what he omitted—the left eye slightly softer, as if retreating into thought.

Why This Portrait?
Because it’s possibly art history’s most profound whisper. At 60, da Vinci didn’t draw his face—he drew the act of seeing himself see.

Pencil on card

For Sale

This was my attempt to crack the Old Master's most enigmatic smile—not through imitation, but immersion in his methods.

What the Process Revealed:

• Her Skin is a Lie: Those famous sfumato transitions? 20+ translucent glazes in oils—mimicked here with acrylic medium retarder and a dry-brush whisper technique.

• The Landscape Breathes: Da Vinci's background isn't static topography—it's geological pulse. My version exaggerates the glacial blues to highlight his deliberate temperature shifts.

• That Smile is a Mirror: The longer you mix the exact burnt umber/green earth blend for her lips, the more you realize—she's not smiling. You are.

Why Acrylic?
Because da Vinci was the original rule-breaker. He'd have adored modern pigments' intensity (though he'd scoff at their predictability).

Acrylic on Canvas

For Sale

This sketch reproduction was my attempt to trace the moment before genius erupted—when Picasso was still Velázquez’s shadow, not yet his own earthquake.

What the Charcoal Taught Me:

• The Hunger in the Lines: Those dense, searching marks around his jacket collar? Not confidence—ambition vibrating through uncertainty.

• Eyes Older Than His Face: Smudged hollows beneath the pupils suggest the 80-year-old he’d become already lived inside this youth.

• The Coming Storm: The left side of his face dissolves into abstraction—a premonition of Cubism, accidental yet inevitable.

Why This Portrait?
Because every revolution has its breath before the bang. This is Picasso listening to the 20th century approach.

Charcoal on paper

For Sale

This seismic work—where modern art cracked open—demanded more than reproduction; it required reckoning. My version confronts:

The Violence of the Original

• Those jagged Iberian limbs? Recreated with palette knife scars in thick acrylic gel, then sanded back to mimic Picasso’s brutal revisions.

• The infamous "African" masks? My pigments mirror his stolen Congo motifs—raw sienna mixed with cracking medium for tribal authenticity he never actually studied.

Why This Painting?
Because it’s the birth (and betrayal) of 20th century art. My copy doesn’t excuse its colonial sins—it amplifies them through deliberate material tension.

Acrylic on Board

For Sale

This original work channels Joan Miró’s surrealist vocabulary—floating biomorphs, grids of colour imitating Mondrian's rigid marks and the childlike joy of unapologetic mark-making—while filtering it through my own contemporary lens.

What Miró Taught Me:

• The Freedom of Simplicity: His seemingly "naive" lines are deceptively precise—each curve balances the composition like a tightrope walker.

• Colour as Language: Cadmium reds and cobalt blues don’t just fill space—they argue with each other. My palette honours his Catalan roots while adding neon whispers.

• The Subconscious at Play: Miró worked in a state of near-trance. I embraced this by painting the first layer blindfolded, letting instinct guide the foundational shapes.

Why This Homage?
Because Miró proved that art could be both profoundly sophisticated and wildly free. My piece is not a copy—it’s a conversation across time, with inside jokes (spot the hidden coffee stain turned into a planet).

Acrylic and Marker on Ply

Hokusai's wave has traveled far from its 19th-century Edo origins. No longer just a print, it is a global icon—a symbol appropriated by everything from academic textbooks to coffee mugs, often stripped of its original context and peril. My watercolour tribute is an attempt to reclaim its narrative, not through replication, but through the medium's own language of fragility and flow.

This piece engages with the wave's new, unintended meanings: as a foreshadowing of environmental vulnerability and the terrifying beauty of natural forces we can no longer control.

• The Medium is the Message: I abandoned the sharp, replicable line of the woodblock for the unique, uncontrollable bleed of watercolour. The wave's form is not carved but grown—shaped by the resistance of the paper and the flow of pigment, making the water itself the co-author of its own image. This mirrors our modern understanding: we cannot command nature; we can only respond to its force.

• A Frail Icon: The famous Prussian blue is rendered in layered, translucent washes. The paper buckles with moisture; there is no varnish, no permanent seal. This deliberate fragility is a counterpoint to the image's commercial, indestructible ubiquity. It asks the viewer to see past the icon to the delicate ecosystem it represents—one that is now buckling under the weight of a changing climate.

• Fuji Diminished: In the original, Mount Fuji is a stable, spiritual anchor. Here, it is further obscured by the wave's spray and the haze of the medium—a subtle nod to how the existential threat of rising seas can eclipse even the most permanent features of our world.

This is not merely a copy. It is a meditation on transience, power, and the weight an image carries across centuries. It is the Great Wave, remade for an age of melting ice and rising seas.

For Sale

This original acrylic work inverts Rothko’s iconic Orange and Blue (1956), transforming his atmospheric blend into a charged encounter—where molten gold intervenes as both boundary and bridge.

The Departure from Rothko:

• The Gold Divide: Unlike Rothko’s nebulous transitions, my metallic storm-waves (created with interference gold acrylic) act as a conductor—forcing the blue and orange into electric conversation rather than meditation.

• Acrylic’s Rebellion: His oils breathed; my synthetic pigments crackle. The blue field uses mica flakes to reflect light aggressively, while the orange sinks into matte ferocity.

• Scale as Confrontation: Painted at 40x30", the work refuses Rothko’s enveloping grandeur, opting instead for an intimate but unignorable presence.

Why These Choices?
Because Rothko’s colours hovered—mine collide. That gold sea isn’t just division—it’s the moment before lightning strikes.

Acrylic on Canvas

This original 'color field painting' explores the tension between containment and chaos—where dark ultramarine and fiery orange collide in irregular, painterly forms. Unlike the meditative gradients of Rothko, this work embraces the texture of decision-making, leaving brushstrokes visible as a record of the artistic struggle.

Key Elements:

• Uneven Boundaries: The rectangles are deliberately imperfect—edges bleed, overlap, and fracture, rejecting machined precision for organic tension.

• Materiality on Display: Thick impasto ridges in the orange fields contrast with thin, translucent washes of Prussian blue, creating a dynamic interplay of light absorption and reflection.

• Scale & Proximity: At 40x30", the work invites close viewing, where the hand of the artist becomes evident in every stroke.

Why This Approach?
Because 'color field painting' doesn’t have to be silent. Here, the dialogue between hues is physical—a push-and-pull between control and spontaneity.

Acrylic on Canvas

This hand-painted homage to Rothko's 1953 masterwork Oceanic explores the paradox of his seascapes—where water becomes sky, and depth becomes weightless.

What the Reproduction Revealed:

• The Illusion of Simplicity: Rothko's umber-to-ultramarine gradient required 14 layered glazes—mimicked here with acrylic medium retarder to slow drying for seamless blends

• Edge Alchemy: His famous "halation effect" along the maroon band was achieved not by blending, but by strategic undertones of violet I discovered only through failed attempts

• Scale's Deception: At 40x30", this compact version condenses Rothko's oceanic vastness into a more intimate, but equally immersive encounter

Why This Piece?
Because Deep Ocean represents Rothko's pivotal turn—where his mythological forms dissolved into pure emotional weather. 

Acrylic on Canvas

This was my attempt to inhabit Freud's brutal honesty—to paint without vanity, just as he stared down age, mortality, and the weight of his own artistic legacy.

What the Process Taught Me:

• The Lies of Skin: Freud's famous "grey meat" palette isn't grey at all—it's a battlefield of ochres, greens, and mauves. Matching it required mixing 17 custom neutrals.

• Brush as Scalpel: His wiry beard hairs were each painted individually with a 00 brush—not for realism, but to replicate the tactile disgust he embedded in every stroke.

• Acrylic's Rebellion: Without oils' blending grace, I used matte medium to mimic his creamy impasto, building up ridges that cast self-critical shadows.

Acrylic on board

For Sale

This small but seismic work (just 23.5 x 15.2 cm in the original - mine is smaller) demanded I confront Freud's radical act: painting a (then) living icon as mortal flesh.

What the Portrait Reveals:

• The Crown's Weight: Freud transformed diamonds into fatigue—the tiara sits like a leaden halo. I mixed interference gold with graphite to achieve that oppressive gleam.

• Regal Wattle: Her neck isn't aged—it's excavated. My brush copied each sedimentary layer of his impasto, building coronation jewels from raw umber and flake white.

• The Discomfort: That famous sideways glance reads differently in acrylic; faster drying time forced sharper edges, making her gaze almost accusatory.

Why This Commission?
Because Freud's portrait was less a celebration than an intervention—proof that even crowns can't disguise humanity.

My version amplifies:

• The claustrophobic cropping (your eye fights to escape the frame)

• The deliberate "unfinish" of her left pearl earring (omitted here entirely)

• How the Windsor blues become a sickly cerulean under his light

Acrylic on board

For Sale